Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Cold War #9
Monday, October 29, 2007
Cold War #8
Sunday, October 21, 2007
Cold War Entry #7
I got a little behind on my final bibliography and finally got it submitted tonight. I knew I needed time to sit and think about where I was going with this project. Dr. Woestman recommended that I find some articles or sources that had some viewpoints similar to those of the nuclear scientists and in support of their claim that nuclear weapons were very dangerous in the wrong hands. I was able to find a great deal of information about the danger of nuclear weapons including a web site that had an extensive time line composed by Japanese scientists about the number of close calls we have had concerning the deployment of nuclear weapons. All of the close calls were somewhat unnerving to read including a malfunctioning 46 cent microchip that launched 100 B-29s loaded with nuclear weapons towards the Soviet Union in the early 1980s. A journal article that I read raised some important questions for all of us. If our nuclear weapons stock pile is intended to be a deterrent then why do countries/organizations that do not have nuclear weapons continue to challenge us-are they calling our bluff? Congress has begun to take some action to determine the role of nuclear weapons in the 21st century since our enemy no longer appears to be a nation but rather a radical group of individuals. Once again my research has created more questions for me than answers. I am anxious to get started on the final piece so maybe I can begin to develop answers to my questions.
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Cold War Entry #6

Every time I pick up this assignment to work on it I get so drawn into it that the time disappears. I am excited by the topic I chose and every piece that I research leads me to another and another. I'm afraid my biggest problem as I work towards completion is that I may have too much material. I believed I chose a narrow topic to cover but it expands every week. Now my task will be to narrow it back down again. I am really excited about one aspect of the project. I will be completing 4 power points as a final project. I have been trying to import the short video clips of the nuclear test blasts into my power points. I have the video clips from 6 tests of atomic and hydrogen bombs. I finally succeeded yesterday. I am not sure how it will play out on the big screen but I am just excited that I got it to work. Included in this blog is a picture of the blast over Hiroshima from August 6, 1945.
Source Info:
Records of U. S. AirForce Commands, Activities, and Organizations. "ARC Search." National Archives. August 6, 1945. www.archives.org (accessed October 15, 2007). ARC: 542192
Monday, October 8, 2007
Cold War Outline
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Cold War #4
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Cold War #3
I had an opportunity to visit the Kansas Cosmosphere this weekend. The space race is an absolute reflection of the cold war. The scientists of the space program in both the United States and the Soviet Union are a large part of the exhibit. Whether they were Russian scientists, American scientists or German rocket scientists (the precursor to the space program) there was a lot of pride in what they were able to accomplish and some dismay at the same time. For example, when Werner Von Braun, German rocket scientist, successfully launched a V2 rocket against Great Britain during World War II he was quoted as saying "the rocket performed perfectly, it just hit the wrong planet" . If the scientists of the nuclear age are able to count a success of their technology it is certainly the success of the space program both in the United States and Russia. However, this idea leads to further questioning. If there had not been a weapons program, would there have been a Cold War? If there had not been a weapons program, would there have been a space race? And finally, was the development of nuclear technology inevitable?
Sunday, September 16, 2007
Historiography of the Cold War
The origin of the Cold War continues to be unclear for historians today. Every school of thought continues to speculate on when the Cold War started. Some scholars date it back to the communist revolution in Russia thus setting the starting date in 1917. Others schools of thought put the Cold War origins in the 1930s with the growth of Stalin's power in the USSR, and his purges. And finally, another school of thought puts the origins of the Cold War at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. Massive amounts of documents related to the Cold War are constantly being released putting more information in the hands of scholars. Traditionally the Cold War has been portrayed as primarily a weapons race between the United States and the Soviet Union. However, as more documents related to the Cold War are declassified it is clear that the weapons race was just a part of the Cold War. The Arms Race was a central piece of the Cold war much like a pebble in a pond; the weapons race created ripples in global relations for all countries of the world. Scholars can now study the role of race relations in the United States, Presidential records and the development of atomic weaponry in other World War II powers such as Great Britain, France and Germany. And finally, the former Soviet Union has begun to reveal their role in the arms race so historians can now study both countries Cold War policies.
Monday, September 3, 2007
COLD WAR
Possible topics for the cold war that hasn’t been done to death? I received some documents the other day through the Gilder Lehrman web site. The documents were specifically about the scientists who ‘created’ the science of atomic weaponry. The scientist involved in the Manhattan Project were opposed to the choices being made by the United States government about the management and the use of atomic weapons after World War II. I think this might be interesting to pursue. The documents also mentioned the May-Johnson bill that was proposed to the House of Representatives giving control of atomic weapons completely over to the military. I would like to explore this topic more thoroughly. I know that Robert Oppenheimer ran into some difficulties in the 1950s because of his stance over atomic weapons.
